Gordon v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
CARROLL, Justice.
After waiving a jury trial, appellant was convicted of burglary of a habitation. Finding the felony enhancement allegations contained in the indictment true, the district court assessed punishment at sixty (60) years confinement in the penitentiary. At trial, the State used an accomplice’s testimony to convict appellant. Attacking, among other things, the admissibility of the accomplice’s testimony, appellant now appeals the judgment of conviction. Finding no reversible error, we will affirm the district court’s judgment.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
On January 19, 1989, Kay and Ted…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Haas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Shannon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Hougham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Drilex Systems, Inc. v. FloresTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Stringer v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993
- White v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Clara Renae Richards v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1992
- Clarence Hunter v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.