A. W. Therrien Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtJohnston, C. J.
The plaintiffs concede that the statement which was filed with the Secretary of State on November 15, 1948, should have been filed on or before November 2, 1948, to comply with the statute. This provision of the statute for notice was a condition precedent to any obligation of the insurer. Poirier v. Company, 84 N. H. 461. Moreover, there is no allegation in the petition that the plaintiffs were misled to their disadvantage, prejudice or injury or that the defendant surety company is estopped for any other alleged reason from claiming that the plaintiffs are barred by their failure to comply…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Florsheim v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- Gay v. Preferred Risk Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
- American Insurance v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
- Forbes Farm Partnership v. Farm Family Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
- Debonis v. Warden, New Hampshire State PrisonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.