Legal Opinion
Monolith Portland Cement Co. v. Tendler
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 16, 1962No. Civ. 25836PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.
The appeal by Monolith is from a judgment dismissing the action upon motion of defendants for failure of the amended complaint to state a cause of action. The plaintiffs in the complaint were Monolith, H. H. Wheeler, Margaret M. Willis and Elizabeth Rogers. In the amended complaint, H. H. Wheeler was not named as a plaintiff but was named as a defendant together with Max Tendler, Elizabeth Tendler and Realty Title Company, Ltd. The plaintiffs other than Monolith appeared in propria persona.
The complaint alleged the following material facts. On March 15, 1957, pursuant to an agreement between…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bennett v. Hibernia BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Merkley v. MerkleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Jackson v. LacyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Dynamic Industries Co. v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Gillies v. La Mesa, Lemon Grove & Spring Valley Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Block v. TobinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Diamond International Corp. v. BoasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Wheeler v. TrefftzsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Diamond International Corp. v. BoasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979