Legal Opinion
Caflisch v. Crotty
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 31, 2003PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Robert C. Mulvey, J.
Petitioners/plaintiffs in this combined proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 and 3001 seek to challenge that portion of the determination of the Commissioner of Environmental Conservation made in her interim decision dated October 28, 2002 and embodied in her final decision and order dated December 30, 2002, which held that the petitioners/plaintiffs, in their capacity as landowner and/or lessee in connection with oil and gas leases in the Gregory drilling unit in the Quackenbush Hill Field located in Chemung and Steuben Counties, were not entitled to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kurcsics v. Merchants Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Greystone Mgmt. Corp. v. Conciliation & Appeals Bd. of the City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Wagner v. . MalloryNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Eastern Milk Producers Cooperative Ass'n v. State of New York Department of Agriculture & MarketsNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- DiMiero v. Livingston-Steuben-Wyoming County Board of Cooperative Educational ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Matter of Caflisch v. CrottyNew York Supreme Court · 2003