State v. Na'im B.

Opinion

STOUGHTON, J.

When this case first came before us, we reversed the judgment of conviction of one count of risk of injury to a child on the ground that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict of guilty. Upon certification, our Supreme Court concluded that there was sufficient, evidence to support the verdict, reversed this court’s judgment and remanded the case to us for consideration of the remaining claims of the defendant, Na’im B.

The defendant’s remaining claims are that the trial court (1) failed to disclose all relevant material following its in camera review of a file…