Legal Opinion
Meyer v. Mittal
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided November 16, 2021No. 3:21-cv-00621Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON JASON MEYER, an individual, and No. 3:21-cv-00621 ARGIL DX LLC f/k/a ZAP TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS LLC, a OPINION & ORDER Nevada limited liability company, Plaintiff, v. ANKUR MITTAL, an individual; ARGILDX CONSULTING PVT. LTD. f/k/a ACCUNITY SOFTWARE PVT. LTD., an Indian private company; and ADX CONSULTING INC., a Texas corporation, Defendants, ARGIL DX, an Oregon entity also known as ARGILDX, Nominal Defendant. Heather E. Harriman Rose Law Firm 5200 Meadows Road, Suite 150 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 Eric Charles Lang The Lang Legal Group…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Karim Khoja v. Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.