Legal Opinion

MIitchell v. City of Indio

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 2, 1987No. E003827PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McDANIEL, J.

—In an action against the City of Indio and others to invalidate Annexation No. 54 (see infra) and to compel a special election on the issue, plaintiffs1 have appealed from a summary judgment entered in favor of defendants.

Factual and Procedural Background

The area affected by Annexation No. 54 is comprised of 723.32 acres with an estimated population of 410, and is bounded by railroad tracks on the north; Fred Waring Drive on the south; Jefferson Street on the west, and a storm channel on the east. The annexation was requested by Ted Eichelberger, the developer of a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Morris v. County of MarinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Gantner v. GantnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Canales v. City of AlvisoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. City of Port Hueneme v. City of OxnardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Oldenkott v. American Electric, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Richard S.California Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Silva v. Lori S.California Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Horn v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. CA3California Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API