Legal Opinion

Stagg v. Van Sant

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 31, 1980No. 79-390PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHORES, Justice.

This appeal by Stagg, defendant below, involves the construction of a writing which concerned real estate originally belonging to Van Sant, plaintiff below. Van Sant claims that it is an executory sales contract and that Stagg breached the terms of the contract. Stagg claims that the writing was an unambiguous deed.

The evidence in this case was not transcribed and is not before us. Therefore, we take as true the findings of fact set out in the trial court’s final decree:

1. The original undertakings between Plaintiff and Defendant amounted to a lease by Plaintiff to Defendant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carver v. EadsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  2. Winslett v. RiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  3. Eufaula National Bank v. PruettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  4. Wingard v. RandallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  5. Templeton v. HickmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. J. GORDON NEELY ETC., INC. v. American Nat. Bank of HuntsvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Health Science Products, Inc. v. Taylor (In Re Health Science Products, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API