Legal Opinion

Watkins v. Peacock

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 2008No. 33684PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURDICK, Justice.

Appellant Arnold Peacock appeals from a district court order granting Respondents Michael and Louise Watkins’ motion for summary judgment, dismissing Peacock’s coun terclaims with prejudice, and ordering Peacock to restore the roadway to its prior condition. We affirm.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

This ease has a long and storied history, characterized by Peacock’s obstinance and refusal to recognize and comply with valid and final court orders. The easement at issue has already been the subject of one appeal to this Court and a petition for a writ of certiorari to the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ticor Title Co. v. StanionIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Kolln v. Saint Luke's Regional Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Hindmarsh v. MockIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Davis v. PeacockIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Kiebert v. GossIdaho Supreme Court · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. McPheeIdaho Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. City of Ririe v. GilgenIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Tidwell v. Blaine CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2023
  4. Caldwell Land & Cattle v. Johnson ThermalIdaho Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API