Legal Opinion

Mills v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 27, 2005No. 4D04-4314PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We reverse the trial court’s order summarily denying the “rule 3.850(h)” motion filed pursuant to Steele v. Kehoe, 747 So.2d 931 (Fla.1999), by Brian I. Mills, which should have been treated as a petition for writ of habeas corpus. Id. at 934.

We find Mills alleged a legally sufficient claim requesting permission to file a belated motion for postconviction relief. We direct the trial court on remand to conduct an evidentiary hearing to determine whether Mills, through his mother and family friend, retained counsel to file a timely rule 3.850 motion, and whether counsel failed timely to file…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Steele v. KehoeSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  2. Medrano v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  3. Krasnick v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Alfonso v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  2. Montalvo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API