Legal Opinion

State v. Miller

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 3, 1988No. 289A87PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEYER, Justice.

Defendant was convicted of first-degree sexual offense with a child under the age of thirteen. On appeal, he argues that the trial court erred in (1) excluding certain time periods under the Speedy Trial Act; (2) failing to find that defendant’s case had previously been dismissed; (3) refusing to allow cross-examination of the State’s material witness to show (a) her bias, interest or motivation for testifying and (b) a specific instance of conduct to show her character for untruthfulness; and (4) failing to exclude specific character evidence in defendant’s cross-examination.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. KirkleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. SatterfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. State v. SearlesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. State v. McCoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. State v. CareySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. LocklearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  2. State v. SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  3. State v. FairclothCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  4. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  5. Crump v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API