Jezeski v. Northeast Investment Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
Action to recover for services. Tbe action was dismissed at tbe close of tbe plaintiff’s testimony and be appeals from tbe order denying bis motion for a new trial.
There are two causes of action. One is to recover for services as treasurer of the defendant in 1922. The other is to recover for services in 1922 outside of the ordinary duties of treasurer.
The plaintiff was treasurer in 1922 and prior years. He received a stated yearly compensation prior to 1922. In 1922 he was a member of the defendant’s building committee. Construction work of some moment was under way. At a meeting of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fitzgerald & Mallory Construction Co. v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Jones v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- National Loan & Investment Co. v. Rockland Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
- Deane v. HodgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Rogers v. Hastings & Dakota Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Boyum v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
- Ebert-Hicken Co. v. Scott-Bevier Iron Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929