Legal Opinion
Stahl v. Norwich
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 9, 1923PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
Following the reversal of the order granting a writ of assistance as to certain articles (204 App. Div. 552) the defendants have moved for an order of restitution. Restitution rests in the discretion of the court. (Civ. Prac. Act, §§ 529, 554, 587, 1444; Merriam v. Wood & Parker Lithographing Co., 155 N. Y. 136; Market Nat. *425Bank v. Pacific Nat. Bank, 102 id. 464; Marvin v. Brewster Iron Mining Co., 56 id. 671.)
In view of the sale of some of the articles involved and their attachment to the freehold, justice will be best served by denying the motion in our discretion. This in nowise precludes…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Haebler v. . MyersNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Merriam v. Wood & Parker Lithographing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Stahl v. NorwichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- Lombard v. AtwaterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gagen v. Kipany Productions, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Dinizio & Cook, Inc. v. Duck Creek Marina at Three Mile Harbor, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Rae v. RosenbergNew York Supreme Court · 1971
- Carroll v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995