Legal Opinion

Rinaldo v. Board of Medical Examiners

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 3, 1947No. Civ. 15764PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDoran, J.

The peremptory writ of mandate issued by the superior court, directed the appellant, Board of Medical Examiners, hereinafter called the board, to grant the respondent Eugene J. Rinaldo, “a full and fair hearing upon his petition (for reinstatement of license) presented to the defendant Board on August 13, 1945, and to enter a decision thereon after such full and fair hearing thereof.”

Respondent’s petition for the writ of mandate sets forth that on June 12, 1922, Rinaldo, alleged to be a “practicing physician and surgeon in good standing in the State of Missouri,” applied to the board for a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dare v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Tennant v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. Rinaldo v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Rinaldo v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Rinaldo v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Colorado State Board of Medical Examiners v. BoyleColorado Court of Appeals · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API