Legal Opinion

State v. Floreck

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 12, 2002No. 23148-4-IIPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

A jury found Jeffrey Floreck guilty of a series of storage unit burglaries. The State introduced a taped statement by Floreck’s accomplice implicating Floreck. At trial, the accomplice said that she lied in the statement and that she could not remember what she said on the tape. The court found her unavailable as a witness and admitted her taped statement. The State also presented evidence gathered in a warrantless search of a locked room in Floreck’s brother’s home. His brother consented to the search, but Floreck claims he lacked authority to do so. We hold that the search was lawful, but…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. State v. SalinasWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. CamarilloWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. DelmarterWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. HalstienWashington Supreme Court · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. NavaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  2. State v. FloreckCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API