Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Loudres v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided September 10, 1980No. 63676Published

1ConcurrencePhillips, Judge

I wholeheartedly agree that this cause must be reversed in light of Adams v. Texas, 448 U.S. 38, 100 S.Ct. 2521, 65 L.Ed.2d 581 (1980). I write this concurring opinion in order to make two points.

First, I must emphatically disassociate myself from the majority opinion’s implicit endorsement of Mr. Justice Rehnquist’s dissent in Adams. As a factual matter, § 12.31(b) of our penal code routinely operates to deny the capital defendant his right to a fair and impartial jury under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments. § 12.31(b) does this by eliminating from the jury all persons except those who…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Adams v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Albrecht v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  3. Carrillo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  4. Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1953
  5. Rodriguez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API