Legal Opinion

Woodruff v. Deshazo

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 4, 1915No. 869PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Collingsworth County Court; A. C. Nicholson, Judge. Action by J. W. Deshazo against C. X. Woodruff. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

The appellee, Deshazo, sued the appellant, Woodruff, alleging the death of a horse owned by him, on account of falling into a cistern on appellant's premises, which was negligently left unfenced and unprotected. The defendant, Woodruff, as a special defense, pleaded the existence of a city ordinance of the city of Wellington, prohibiting the running at large of live stock contrary to the provisions of the same, and that said horse was at large in violation of said ordinance. If it were unlawful for the plaintiff to permit his horse to run at large within the corporate limits of the town of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of Austin v. WaltonTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  2. City of Dallas v. Western Electric Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1901
  4. Schott v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Trustees of Elizabethtown v. LeflerIllinois Supreme Court · 1859

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Biddle v. Board of Adjustment, Village of Spring ValleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  2. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. BeckCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Cannon v. HathawayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. Weddle v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1982
  5. Tutor v. City of AmarilloCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API