Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Baroni

Fayette County Court of Quarter Sessions

Decided August 21, 1945No. 36Published

1Opinion of the Court

Carr, J.,

(Dumbauld, P. J., dissenting, August 23, 1945). — These are motions for a new trial and in arrest of judgment. Theodore Baroni and Ruth J. Frost, defendants, were tried and convicted upon an indictment charging them with conspiracy to withhold, convert, and apply to their own *498use certain moneys alleged to have belonged to William H. Smart, the prosecutor. The motions raise questions of the sufficiency of the evidence to support the charge as a matter of law.

On the part of the Commonwealth the evidence was, in substance, as follows: On May 29, 1932, Smart, being the owner of eight…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Shapiro v. WilgusSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Dent v. FergusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Gill ex rel. Rankin v. HenrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
  4. Bunn, Raiguel & Co. v. AhlSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1857
  5. Kennedy v. BorieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API