Legal Opinion

Stanley v. Tinsman

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 21, 1963Published

1Opinion of the CourtWebber, J.

On June 12, 1959 the plaintiff purchased from the defendant for a single sum by conditional sale contract four pieces of equipment commonly used in highway and building construction. Defendant failed to deliver one item, a used L57 Sullivan jackhammer. This unit was in the physical possession of one Morley in Massachusetts with whom it had been lodged for repairs by a previous owner. Mr. Morley failed to respond to defendant’s demand for possession after he was informed that a sale had been made to plaintiff. Upon trial of plaintiff’s complaint seeking damages for non-delivery, the justice…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cyr v. GiesenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1954
  2. Miller v. Trustees of the Mariner's ChurchSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1830
  3. Glazier v. TetraultSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1952
  4. Michalka v. GREAT NORTHERN PAPER COMPANYSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1955
  5. South Gardiner Lumber Co. v. BradstreetSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API