United States v. Azar
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
TALBOT SMITH, District Judge.
This is a legal test of two recently-enacted anti-racketeering statutes. 1 The facts are largely stipulated. What we have before us is a tip sheet (called a Greensheet, Exhibit 1) employed in the numbers racket to guide the players to successful choices of numbers. The ac tivities of the defendants in connection with the printing (in Ohio) and the distribution (in Michigan) thereof bring them before us.
Both defendants are named in each count of an 18 count indictment. Counts 1, 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16 charge that on certain specified dates the defendants knowingly…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1962
- United States v. George L. Kelly, Thomas Francis Kelly, Sr., Thomas Francis Kelly, Jr. And Louis EfkemanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
3Cited by14 opinions
- Erlenbaugh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. J. F. Barnes, James Tubb Washer and Robert CarneyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
- United States v. Bally Manufacturing CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1972
- William R. McIntosh v. United States of America, Joe Dale Wilson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- United States v. ErlenbaughCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.