Legal Opinion

Riksem v. City of Seattle

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 23, 1987No. 16188-1-IPublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Schultheis, J. *

Anton Riksem appeals from the dismissal of his complaint on summary judgment, assigning error to the trial court's finding that his suit against the City of Seattle is barred by RCW 4.24.210 (recreational use statute) and that the statute is not violative of the state and federal constitutions.

Facts

On a sunny warm Monday, June 11, 1979, Anton Riksem, an experienced cyclist and sometime racer, cycled the entire 12 1 /2-mile length of the Burke-Gilman Trail. Once he reached the northern terminus of the trail he turned around to return to his truck which was located 12 V2 miles…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Hartley v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Gruen v. State Tax CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Clark v. DwyerWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Roza Irrigation District v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1972

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Ravenscroft v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Walker v. City of ScottsdaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  3. Camicia v. Howard S. Wright Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Olson v. Bismarck Parks & Recreation DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Chamberlain v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API