Legal Opinion

Jeneric/pentron, Inc. v. Dillon Company, Inc. And Chemichl, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided March 20, 2000No. 99-1283PublishedCited by 92 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RADER, Circuit Judge.

The United States District Court for the District of Connecticut denied Jeneric/Pentron, Inc.’s (Jeneric’s) motion for a preliminary injunction against Dillon Company, Inc. and Chemichl, Inc. (collectively, Dillon). See Jeneric/Pentron, Inc. v. Dillon Co., No. 3:98-CV-818 (EBB), 1999 WL 66537 (D.Conn. Feb.3, 1999) (Jeneric). Because Jeneric has not shown sufficient reason to overturn the trial court’s denial of a preliminary injunction, this court affirms.

I

Both Jeneric and Dillon sell porcelain dental restoration products. Jeneric received U.S. Patent No. 5,653,791 (’791…

2Cases cited19 opinions

MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by92 opinions

Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company v. Chemque, Inc. (Formerly Known as Chemque Canada, Ltd.) and Thomas & Betts Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
John D. Watts v. Xl Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
Pfizer, Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals Usa, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
Abbott Laboratories v. Sandoz, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
Ecolab, Inc. v. Envirochem, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.