Legal Opinion

People v. Aggie

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 1, 1940No. Crim. 3275PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.

Defendant was charged in an information containing two counts with the crimes of violating subdivisions 2 and 3 of section 337a of the Penal Code. Count 1, based on the alleged violation of subdivision 2 of the section, was dismissed, and defendant was convicted by the court sitting without a jury on count 2, in which it was charged that defendant received the sum of $1 to be wagered on the result of a horse race.

Defendant contends that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the judgment of conviction. Only two witnesses were presented by the prosecution, police officers McCoy and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. HurlbertWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  2. People v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  3. Fletcher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. MannSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
  2. People v. BillingsleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. People v. HoffmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. People v. AggieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API