Legal Opinion · Dissent

Caldwell v. Village of Island Park

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 15, 1952Published

1DissentLewis, J.

My dissent is prompted by the belief that the decision about to be made extends, beyond the present bounds of decisional law in this jurisdiction, the legal duty of municipalities in the care of public parks.

Upon the facts of record — fairly stated in the opinion by Judge Conway — I do not think it can be said that the defendant village failed to exercise the standard of care it owed to the infant plaintiff in the maintenance of Beach Park. That standard of care required of the defendant that it use reasonable means to protect the infant plaintiff from all dangers known by it or reasonably to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Curcio v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. Peterson v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  3. Clayton v. City of Niagara FallsNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  4. Fedearowicz v. City of AmsterdamNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
  5. Riggi v. Village of Le RoyNew York Court of Appeals · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API