Legal Opinion
United States v. Joel Torres Salas, United States of America v. Vincente Flores Munoz
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 19, 1989No. 88-3221, 88-3228PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALARCON, Circuit Judge:
Vincente Munoz (Munoz) and Joel Torres Salas (Salas) appeal from the order denying their motions to suppress evidence introduced at trial on the issue of guilt. Each was found guilty of possessing more than five hundred grams of cocaine with intent to distribute. The evidence was seized pursuant to two search warrants. Munoz and Salas contend that the first search warrant was invalid because it was issued on the basis of facts obtained as the result of unreasonable searches and seizures. Munoz challenges the validity of the second warrant on the ground that it was…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Segura v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- United States v. Amador Rodriguez Chaidez, A/K/A Rodriguez Amador Chaidez and Amador RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Pedro v. SpedalieriCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Gene Allen HerroldCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Robert Earl SandersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Anthony Bruce CannonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.