Legal Opinion

Emery v. Atlanta Real Estate Exchange

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 7, 1891PublishedCited by 42 opinions

Contracts. Real estate brokers. Evidence. Charge of court. ■ Practice in Supreme Court. Before Judge Richard H. Clark. DeKalb superior court. February term, 1891. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Lumpkin, Justice.

The defendant claimed to be the owner of a certain lot in the' city of Atlanta, and the plaintiffs, who were real estate brokers doing business under the name of the Atlanta Real Estate Exchange, undertook to find a purchaser for the lot. After some preliminary negotiation, a contract was drawn up in two parts as follows: “I will offer the place at $11,250 net until 10 May, 1890,” signed hy the defendant; “We accept the above at $11,250 net upon condition that sale is perfected,” signed by one of the plaintiffs as manager. It was understood that the plaintiffs should get as…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Sibbald v. . the Bethlehem Iron CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Chicago v. SheldonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  3. Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. Wylie v. . Marine National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  5. McGavock v. WoodliefSupreme Court of the United States · 1858

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Phinizy v. BushSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  2. Maddox v. Life & Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  3. Wellmaker v. WheatleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  4. Merchants National Bank v. DemereSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  5. Newton Brothers, Inc. v. ShankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API