Legal Opinion
Morse v. Home Savings & Loan Ass'n
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 16, 1895No. 9072PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Hicks, J., denying her motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
The defendant, a corporation, on and prior to January 12, 1893, was the owner of eight mortgages upon as many separate lots then owned by the plaintiff. Each of the mortgages' secured the payment of $1,500 and interest, and provided for the-payment of $75 attorney’s fees in case of foreclosure. Default was made in the conditions of the mortgages, and the defendant, on the day named, proceeded to foreclose all of the mortgages by advertisement; and the same were foreclosed, and the premises sold to-the defendant on February 27, 1893. ’ The defendant retained from the proceeds of the sales $75…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Campbell v. WormanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Deane v. HodgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Rogers v. Hastings & Dakota Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
- Hobe v. SwiftSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Mill City Plastics, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1955
- Eliason v. SidleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Jezeski v. Northeast Investment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Kingsley v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908