Legal Opinion
Pope Motor Car Co. v. Keegan
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio
Decided November 7, 1906No. 1,992PublishedCited by 15 opinions
In Equity. On motion for preliminary injunction.
1Opinion of the Court
TAYLER, District Judge.
On October 5, 1906, the complainant filed its bill against John J. Keegan, J. M. Keck, and some 270 other -persons, charging a conspiracy among the defendants, and with other persons unknown to the complainant, to carry into execution a strike at the factory of the complainant at Toledo; that one of the objects of the strike was to compel the complainant to submit to the dictation of Keegan and Keck, who were officials of the International Association of Machinists, as to the terms and conditions upon which the complainant should employ machinists; and that all of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re LennonSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Karges Furniture Co. v. Amalgamated Woodworkers Local Union No. 131Indiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Union Pac. R. Co. v. RuefU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nebraska · 1902
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hotel & Restaurant Employees v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- Tri-City Central Trades Council v. American Steel FoundriesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1916
- Stephens v. Ohio State Telephone Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1917
- Hawthorne v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Dail-Overland Co. v. Willys-Overland, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1919
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.