Legal Opinion
Wielepski v. Harford County
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided January 5, 1994No. 617, September Term, 1993PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BISHOP, Judge.
Pursuant to Rule 2.4 of the Harford County Administrative Rules of Procedure for Regulations and Hearings, appellants, Joseph J. Wielepski and Mr. and Mrs. Stanley Wielepski (collectively, “the Wielepskis”), filed an appeal to the Circuit Court for Harford County from a final decision of the Harford County Director of Administration (the “Director”) requiring the Wielepskis to pay a road improvement fee as a condition to the development of real estate. Appellee, Harford County (the “County”), filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, which the circuit court denied. After the court…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ricardo Luis JAUREGUI, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF GLENDALE, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Montgomery Citizens League v. GreenhalghCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
- Maryland Theatrical Corp. v. BrennanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
- Eastern Diversified Properties, Inc. v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Home Builders Ass'n of Greater Des Moines v. City of West Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
- Country Joe, Inc. v. City of EaganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Lussier v. Maryland Racing CommissionCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- First Baptist Church of St. Paul v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- Montgomery County v. Waters Landing Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.