Legal Opinion

Roos v. Aloi

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1985PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Arthur D. Spatt, J.

These actions concern the rights and obligations of the two shareholders of a close corporation1 which owns and operates a *865retail card and gift shop located at 578 Steward Avenue, Beth-page, New York.

In action No. 1, in a rambling complaint, plaintiff Richard K. Roos (herein referred to as Roos) alleges that he is a shareholder in DJR Card & Gift Shop, Inc. (herein referred to as DJR), and that he is entitled to certain benefits under a shareholders’ agreement with James Aloi, Sr. (herein referred to as Aloi), the only other shareholder in DJR. Roos…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Mountain View Coach Lines, Inc. v. StormsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Darcy v. Brooklyn & New York Ferry Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1909
  3. McQuade v. StonehamNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  4. Hurd v. New York & Commercial Steam Laundry Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1901
  5. New York Credit Men's Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. WeissNew York Court of Appeals · 1953

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. William H. Burke, Cross-Appellant v. Gus Bevona, as President of Local 32b-32j, Service Employees International Union, Afl-Cio, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  2. Morris v. People's Bank & Trust Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Elms Sec. Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1987
  4. 288 St. Nick L. L. C. v. 288 Kiseki Realty, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API