Legal Opinion

State v. Saunders

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 24, 2004No. 28388-3-IIPublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

86 P.3d 232 (2004)

STATE of Washington, Respondent,

v.

Ray Nmn SAUNDERS, Appellant.

No. 28388-3-II.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

March 24, 2004.

John Michael Sheeran, Pierce Cty Prosecutor S, Tacoma, WA, for Respondent.

Mary Katherine Young High, Tacoma, WA, for Appellant.

SEINFELD, J.

Ray Saunders appeals murder, rape, robbery, and kidnapping convictions. He challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to prove the robbery and kidnapping charges and he claims that the trial court improperly admitted his coerced statements, made evidentiary errors, and lacked judicial authority. Finally,…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. State v. KirkmanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. KirkmanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. Rattana Keo PhuongCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  4. State v. Binh ThachCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  5. State v. ElmoreCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API