Legal Opinion

Semo v. Goudreau

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 24, 1950PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNulty, J.

The present proceeding was commenced by a Bill in Equity seeking the reformation of a deed given by the plaintiif to the defendants on the grounds of mutual mistake by the parties. Answer by the defendants was seasonably filed and subsequently a replication by the plaintiif and, after hearing, according to the docket entry, the bill was sustained and thereafter, but before the final decree was made, entered and filed, defendants claimed an appeal by an entry on the docket of the court. It does not require citation of authorities that the claiming of an appeal before a decree is made, entered…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. City of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1949
  2. Morin v. ClaflinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1905
  3. Usen v. UsenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1940
  4. Public Utilities Commission v. GallopSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1948
  5. Carroll v. CarrollSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1949

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Papapetrou v. EdgarSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
  2. Semo v. GoudreauSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1951
  3. McGilvery v. McGilverySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API