Legal Opinion
Hickox v. Chicago & Canada Southern Railway Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 28, 1889PublishedCited by 12 opinions
Error to Lenawee. (Lane, J.) Ejectment. Defendants bring error. Tbe facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
In this case the defeasance in the deed of right of way of the plaintiff to the Chicago & Canada Southern Railway Company reads as follows:
“If the said railway company, its successors or assigns, should fail to complete said railway through said premises, and to put the same in operation, within three years from the date hereof, or if, after such railway is completed and put into operation, it should cease to be used and operated as a railroad, then, in either évent, this release shall cease to be operative, and the right of way granted thereunder shall terminate.”
We think that when this…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Quinn v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Epworth Assembly v. Ludington & Northern RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
- Ludington & Northern Railway v. Epworth AssemblyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
- Weber v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Hawkins v. DillmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.