Legal Opinion

Rothschild v. Kisling

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 4, 1982No. 81-857PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COWART, Judge.

In December of 1977, appellee filed suit against appellant seeking damages for appellant’s infringement of appellee’s common law copyright by the unauthorized use of a set of appellee’s building plans. Although the trial court initially found for the appellant, this court reversed that judgment, directed that judgment be entered for appel-lee, and remanded the case to the trial court for determination of the compensatory damages due the appellee. Kisling v. Rothschild, 388 So.2d 1310 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980), review denied, 397 So.2d 779 (Fla.1981). On remand, the trial court awarded…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  3. Sammons v. Colonial Press, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1942
  4. Jones v. SpindelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  5. Edgar H. Wood Associates, Inc. v. SkeneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. STATE, DHRS v. Southpointe PharmacyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  2. Peacock v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  3. Zoldan v. ZohlmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API