Legal Opinion

Jensen v. Howell

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1929No. 4787PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStraup, J.

This action was brought to have conveyances of real estate and transfers of personal property absolute in form impressed with an express trust alleged to have been orally imposed. The controversy arises among heirs, the children of E. W. Howell, deceased. He had two wives. The plaintiffs, four in number, all women and all married, are children of the first wife. The defendants., twelve in number, men and women, and all married, are children of the second wife. Howell and his first wife separated in about 1868, when the plaintiffs were young children. The children remained with him. For a few…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sheehan v. SullivanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Austin v. WilcoxsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Chambers v. EmeryUtah Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Skeen v. MarriottUtah Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Wiese v. WieseUtah Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Dahlberg v. DahlbergUtah Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Denver & R. G. W. R. Co. v. Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Wallick v. VanceUtah Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Barrett v. VickersUtah Supreme Court · 1941

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API