Legal Opinion
GROHS v. LANIGAN
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided November 21, 2024No. 2:16-cv-07083Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY STEVEN GROHS, Plaintiff, Civil Action No.: 16-7083 (JXN) (JBC) v. OPINION GARY M. LANIGAN, et. al., Defendants. NEALS, District Judge Plaintiff Steven Grohs (“Plaintiff”) is civilly committed under the New Jersey Sexually Violent Predator Act at the Special Treatment Unit (“STU”) at the Adult Diagnostic and Treatment Center in Avenel, New Jersey. Plaintiff is proceeding pro se with a civil rights complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983. Presently before the Court is Defendants Gary M. Lanigan (“Lanigan”), Sherry Yates (“Yates”), Maj.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Boyle v. County Of Allegheny PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- W.B. v. MatulaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Orson, Inc. T/a Roxy Screening Rooms v. Miramax Film Corp. Orson, Inc., D/b/a/ Roxy Screening RoomsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.