Legal Opinion
Ford Consumer Finance Co. v. Maddaloni (In Re Maddaloni)
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided July 17, 1998No. 3:97-cv-01548PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING
HALL, District Judge.
The question presented in this appeal is whether 11 U.S.C. § 1322(b)(2), whieh prohibits modification of a creditor’s claims when those claims are secured by a mortgage on the debtor’s principal place of residence, extends to a claim secured by a multi-unit property in which only one of the units is the debtor’s principal residence. That is, does § 1322(b)(2)’s antimodification provision apply when the creditor’s security interest extends to other income-producing units located in the same structure as the debtor’s principal residence? For the reasons that follow,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Nobelman v. American Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Lomas Mortgage, Inc. v. Esperandieu & Antonine LouisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- In Re McGregorUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1994
- Adebanjo v. Dime Savings Bank of New York, FSB (In Re Adebanjo)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re Frances Scarborough, Frances Scarborough v. Chase Manhattan Mortgage CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- In Re BulsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2005
- In Re MooreUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 2010
- In Re ZaldivarUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2011
- In re WagesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.