Legal Opinion
South Shore National Bank v. DONNER
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 7, 1969PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
104 N.J. Super. 169 (1969)
249 A.2d 25
SOUTH SHORE NATIONAL BANK, A NATIONAL BANKING CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF,
v.
MARK M. DONNER, BETTE S. DONNER, RUTH SATSKY JEWELRY AND JULES BRUSKIN, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided January 7, 1969.
Mr. William Furst, attorney for defendants Ruth Satsky Jewelry and Jules Bruskin.
Mr. Samuel A. Gennet, attorney for plaintiff (Mr. William D. Bierman, appearing).
MILMED, J.C.C. (temporarily assigned).
Defendants Ruth Satsky Jewelry, a corporation, and Jules Bruskin move for a summary judgment in their favor against plaintiff South Shore…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Judson v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. of WestfieldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Judson v. Peoples Bank and Trust Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Standard Accident Insurance v. PellecchiaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Giles v. GassertSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- George M. Brewster & Son, Inc. v. Catalytic Construction Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Delaney v. PenzaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- Swiss Credit Bank v. Henry BalinkCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Matter of BoyanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
- Boyan v. O'ConnorNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
- Professional Savings Bank v. Galloway Farm Nursery, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.