Legal Opinion
Paulin v. Paulin
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 20, 1940No. Civ. 6401PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEMMON, J., pro tem.
This action is one in declaratory relief, in which the plaintiff sought to have determined the rights of the parties to an agreement entered into between himself and his former wife during the existence of the marriage relation. Prom a judgment adverse to him this appeal was taken.
The plaintiff and the defendant, Grace H. Paulin, entered into an agreement on March 5, 1915. The agreement recites that Mrs. Paulin inherited in 1907 approximately $18,000 from her parents, which, during the marriage relation, came under the control and disposition of the plaintiff, and “the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kautz v. Zurich General Accident & Liability InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Miller v. Bay Cities Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Teater v. Good Hope Development Corp.California Supreme Court · 1939
- Slama Tire Protector Co. v. RitchieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- Green v. CarottaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Davenport v. DavenportCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Apartments, Inc. v. TrottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Southern California Aircraft Corp. v. City of OntarioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959