Legal Opinion

Sanford v. Nueces River Valley R. Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 24, 1912PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Bee County Court; T. M. Cox, Judge. Action by H. W. Sanford against the Nueces River Valley Railroad Company and others. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJames, C. J.

H. W. Sanford sued on a promissory note. The defense was failure of consideration. There was a verdict against plaintiff. The case was submitted to the jury on said issue. The assignments of error question the judgment upon the ground that the verdict was contrary to and unsupported by the evidence. In no other respect are the proceedings questioned.

This was not the position taken by appellant at the trial. On the contrary, he asked charges submitting the issue, which were given. He tried the case, and participated in its being submitted on said issue, upon the theory that there was evidence…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Poindexter v. Receivers of the Kirby Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lake v. Jones Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  2. Masterson v. TurnleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  3. Stark v. R. B. George MacHinery Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  5. Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API