Legal Opinion
Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Williams
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided April 17, 1917No. 1777Published
1Opinion of the Court
WILLSON, O. J.
(after stating the facts as above). The jury were not authorized by the charge to find for appellee, unless they did so in accordance with instructions as follows:
“If you believe from the evidence that on or about the 6th day of November, 1915, as alleged in plaintiff’s petition, Ike Williams, the plaintiff, was engaged in the operation of a planing machine for the defendant, and that the equipment of said machine was defective in not being equipped with a slow feed, and if you believe that it was negligence on the part of defendant to furnish the machine to plaintiff to do the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. SeinTexas Supreme Court · 1895
- Kettler Brass Manufacturing Co. v. O'NeilCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
- Paris & G. N. R. v. FlandersTexas Supreme Court · 1915
- T. N. O. R. R. Co. v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Wichita Cotton Oil Co. v. HannaTexas Supreme Court · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.