Legal Opinion

Covey v. Western Tank Lines, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1950No. 31260Published

1Opinion of the Court

36 Wn.2d 381 (1950)

218 P.2d 322

HARRY COVEY, Respondent,

v.

WESTERN TANK LINES, INC., Appellant.[1]

No. 31260.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department Two.

May 13, 1950.

Skeel, McKelvy, Henke, Evenson & Uhlmann, W.R. McKelvy and Altha P. Curry, for appellant.

W.R. Cole and J.D. Thomas, Jr., for respondent.

HAMLEY, J.

This is an action in negligence to recover damages occasioned by the loss of five male mink.

Harry Covey owns and operates a mink ranch a short distance east of Cle Elum, Washington, and adjacent to state primary highway No. 10. On the afternoon of September 22, 1947, a truck with…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Arkansas Valley Land & Cattle Co. v. MannSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Morner v. Union Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. D'Amico v. ConguistaWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Hardman v. YounkersWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Covey v. Western Tank Lines, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1950

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API