Legal Opinion

Scheiner v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 17, 1932PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownley, J.

This is an action to recover the proceeds of an accident policy. The policy insured decedent against the results of bodily injuries sustained directly and independently of all other causes by violent and accidental means. The policy excluded the risk of suicide while sane or insane or of death from any physical infirmity. Death resulted from the taking by decedent of a large quantity of amytal in both tablet and liquid form on the night of June 26, 1931. He was found dead the next morning. He was in the habit of taking amytal to make himself sleep. In no event should more than two tablets be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Reed v. . McCordNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. Rudolph v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1929

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Thomas E. BreiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  2. Poses v. Travelers InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  3. Nagel v. PaigeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  4. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. BreiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  5. Levy v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API