Legal Opinion

Maholland v. BIRD

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 23, 1974No. Appeal, 103PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hoffman, J.,

Appellant contends that the trial court erroneously excluded the proffered testimony of appellant’s expert.

On July 26, 1969, appellant, plaintiff below, attended a social outing held at appellees’ home, celebrating the end of the season of the Downingtown Little League. The appellant was the father of one of the boys in the league. Appellant was seriously injured when he struck some portion of the appellees’ swimming pool while executing a dive from the diving board.

Appellant brought an action in trespass in the Court of Common Pleas in Chester County. The action for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cummings v. Nazareth BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. Cooper v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Burton v. Horn & Hardart Baking Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. Collins v. ZedikerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Huck-Gerhardt Co. v. KendallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lebesco v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Densler v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. McKenzie v. Cost Bros., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Beros v. Children's Exchange, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Mercer County1989
  5. Gnan v. Schmidt, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Elk County1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API