Legal Opinion

Guthrie v. Allison

District Court, S.D. California

Decided June 15, 2020No. 3:19-cv-01452Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 IAN GUTHRIE, Case No.: 3:19-cv-1452-WQH-AHG 12 Petitioner, ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S 13 v. MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL 14 M.E. SPEARMAN, Warden, [ECF No. 18] 15 Respondent. 16 17 Before the Court is Petitioner Ian Guthrie’s (“Petitioner”) Motion to Appoint 18 Counsel. ECF No. 18. For the reasons that follow, the Motion is DENIED. 19 I. BACKGROUND 20 Petitioner, proceeding pro se, submitted a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 21 pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2254

along with a request to proceed in forma pauperis on…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Frederick C. Wilborn v. Antonio Escalderon and Ruth RushenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. Vernon C. Weygandt v. Donald Look, Superintendent, and the Attorney General for the State of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  4. Sammy Lee Terrell v. R.D. Brewer, Warden Jon Morales Christopher C. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. Palmer v. ValdezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API