Legal Opinion
United States v. Right to use & Occupy 3.38 Acres of Land
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided September 25, 1973No. 72-2493PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BUTZNER, Circuit Judge:
Keltec Division of Aiken Industries, Inc. appeals from a condemnation award that the district court entered on a jury verdict. Aiken contends: (1) that the government lacked authority to condemn the land; (2) that the district court adopted an erroneous valuation test; *1142and (3) that the district court improperly allocated the jury award between the landlord and tenant. Only in the allocation of the award do we find that the district court committed error.
The United States filed a complaint in the Eastern District of Virginia to condemn a leasehold interest in certain…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. Petty Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. Dan T. KennedyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Polson Logging Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
- John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Vandevere v. LloydCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Independence Park Apartments v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Pennsylvania Avenue Development Corporation v. One Parcel of Land in the District of Columbia National Press Building Corporation, Pennsylvania Avenue Development Corporation v. One Parcel of Land in the District of Columbia Edmund W. DreyfussCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Right to Use and Occupy 3. 38 Acres of Land, More or LessCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Banisadr Building Joint VentureCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.