Legal Opinion

Holgin v. Texas Employers Insurance Ass'n

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 16, 1990No. 2-89-156-CVPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MEYERS, Justice.

This is an appeal from a suit for benefits under the Worker’s Compensation Act. Appellant, (Jose) J. Samuel Holgin, complains in three points of error that: 1) the jury’s finding that appellant’s injury on or about December 17, 1985, was not a producing cause of any permanent partial incapacity was so against the great weight and preponderance of the evidence presented as to be manifestly wrong, unjust, and constitutes reversible error because the evidence conclusively establishes permanent partial incapacity, as a matter of law; 2) the trial court abused its discretion…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Jackson v. Van WinkleTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Watson v. PrewittTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Ford Motor Co. v. NowakCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bell v. Showa Denko K.K., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API