Legal Opinion

King v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Illinois

District Court, S.D. California

Decided May 13, 2015No. Case No. 3:13-CV-1254-CAB-JMAPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

CATHY ANN BENCIVENGO, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ motions for summary judgment. Specifically, Defendants United Parcel Service of America, Inc. (“UPS”), and UPS Health and Welfare Package for Retired Employees (the “Plan,” and together with UPS, the “UPS Defendants”) filed a motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 48] on the first, second, third and fifth causes of action. Defendant Health Care Service Corporation doing business as Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Illinois (“Blue Cross”) joined the UPS Defendants’ motion. [Doc.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Hardt v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Abatie v. Alta Health & Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API