Legal Opinion
King Cnty. v. Azar
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided May 29, 2018No. CASE NO. C18–0242–JCCPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
John C. Coughenour, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
ORDER
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff King County's ("King County" or the "County") motion for a preliminary injunction and summary judgment (Dkt. No. 20) and Defendants Alex Azar and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services' ("Defendants") cross-motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 26). Having thoroughly considered the parties' briefing and the relevant record, the Court finds oral argument unnecessary and hereby GRANTS King County's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 20) and DENIES Defendants' cross-motion for…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Service v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Planned Parenthood of N.Y.C., Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of Health & Human Servs.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Multnomah Cnty., an Existing Cnty. Gov'T&a Body Politic & Corporate v. AzarDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2018
- Promundo-Us v. Department of Health and Human ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019