Smith v. Zumpfe
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtShake, J.
This case comes before us on a motion to dismiss, and the question is whether the order sought to be reviewed is a final judgment or an interlocutory-decree. If it is interlocutory the appeal was not taken in time.
The order was one for the sale of real estate entered in a receivership proceeding. It was recited therein, “that the Court expressly reserves jurisdiction to refuse for any reason to confirm any sale made pursuant to this order.” An order for the sale of real estate in which the court reserves the right to refuse to confirm the sale is usually regarded as interlocutory, upon the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Zumpfe v. Piccadilly Realty Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1938
- Woodard v. KillenIndiana Supreme Court · 1925
- Heck v. WaymanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932
- Staley v. DorsetIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
3Cited by9 opinions
- Richards v. Crown Point Community School Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1971
- Zimmerman v. ZumpfeIndiana Supreme Court · 1941
- Matter of Estate of GarwoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
- Lee v. DeShaneyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Walker v. PEOPLES BANK & TRUST CO., ADMR., ETC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.